Filed: Oct. 13, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2446 _ Charles Bausley, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Roy Bass, Deputy, Crawford County * Western District of Arkansas. Detention Center; Kevin Dagan, * Deputy, Crawford County Detention * [UNPUBLISHED] Center, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: October 1, 2004 Filed: October 13, 2004 _ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Bausley appeals the district court’
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2446 _ Charles Bausley, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Roy Bass, Deputy, Crawford County * Western District of Arkansas. Detention Center; Kevin Dagan, * Deputy, Crawford County Detention * [UNPUBLISHED] Center, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: October 1, 2004 Filed: October 13, 2004 _ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-2446
___________
Charles Bausley, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Roy Bass, Deputy, Crawford County * Western District of Arkansas.
Detention Center; Kevin Dagan, *
Deputy, Crawford County Detention * [UNPUBLISHED]
Center, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 1, 2004
Filed: October 13, 2004
___________
Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his constitutional rights in various
1
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
ways. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for
the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-