Filed: Feb. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2480 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Kenneth M. Williams, * Western District of Missouri. * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: February 4, 2005 Filed: February 9, 2005 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kenneth Williams appeals from the final judgment entered by the district court1 upon his guilty plea to a felon-in-possess
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2480 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Kenneth M. Williams, * Western District of Missouri. * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: February 4, 2005 Filed: February 9, 2005 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kenneth Williams appeals from the final judgment entered by the district court1 upon his guilty plea to a felon-in-possessi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-2480
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Kenneth M. Williams, * Western District of Missouri.
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 4, 2005
Filed: February 9, 2005
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Williams appeals from the final judgment entered by the district court1
upon his guilty plea to a felon-in-possession charge, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed
a brief under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the record
independently under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), we agree with counsel that
there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, in view of the district court’s imposition
1
The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
of the statutory minimum sentence, to which Williams did not object. Accordingly,
we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-