Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mario D. Alford, 04-3407 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 04-3407 Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 16, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-3407 _ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska Mario D. Alford, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant. * _ Submitted: February 16, 2005 Filed: March 16, 2005 (Corrected March 17, 2005) _ Before BYE, HEANEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. The defendant in this case was sentenced prior to the United States Supreme Court decisio
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 04-3407
                                   ___________

United States of America,              *
                                       *
            Plaintiff - Appellee,      *
                                       * Appeal from the United States
     v.                                * District Court for the
                                       * District of Nebraska
Mario D. Alford,                       *
                                       *     [UNPUBLISHED]
            Defendant - Appellant.     *
                                  ___________

                            Submitted: February 16, 2005
                                Filed: March 16, 2005 (Corrected March 17, 2005)
                                   ___________

Before BYE, HEANEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

      The defendant in this case was sentenced prior to the United States Supreme
Court decision in United States v. Booker, 
125 S. Ct. 738
(2005). The defendant
raised and preserved error as to the constitutionality of the federal sentencing
guidelines at the time of sentencing. The defendant was also sentenced to the
minimum possible sentence under the applicable federal sentencing guidelines.
Accordingly, we cannot say that the error in this case was harmless. We therefore
vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738
(2005). See, United States v. Haidley, No. 04-3312 (filed March 16,
2005).
                         ___________________________

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer