Filed: Dec. 02, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-3969 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * * _ Submitted: September 12, 2005 Filed: December 2, 2005 _ Before ARNOLD, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A jury convicted Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar of one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and mariju
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-3969 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * * _ Submitted: September 12, 2005 Filed: December 2, 2005 _ Before ARNOLD, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A jury convicted Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar of one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and marijua..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
________________
No. 04-3969
________________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Southern
* District of Iowa.
Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
*
________________
Submitted: September 12, 2005
Filed: December 2, 2005
________________
Before ARNOLD, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
________________
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted Lorenzo Montejano-Quintanar of one count of conspiracy to
distribute methamphetamine and marijuana and two counts each of distribution of
methamphetamine and marijuana, including the distribution of more than 50 grams
of methamphetamine. The district court1 sentenced him to the statutory mandatory
1
The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
minimum of 20 years’ imprisonment based on the jury’s drug-quantity finding and
his prior felony conviction. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Montejano-Quintanar
appeals his conviction and sentence, raising a host of arguments. We have carefully
reviewed the record and find Montejano-Quintanar’s claims of error to be wholly
without merit. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-