Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Sonni Hernandez, 05-1864 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 05-1864 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 12, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1864 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Sonni Natasha Hernandez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 7, 2005 Filed: December 12, 2005 _ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Sonni Natasha Hernandez appeals the 120-month sentence the district court* imposed after Hernandez pleaded guilty to a drug-
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 05-1864
                                    ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
                   Appellee,             * Appeal from the United States
                                         * District Court for the Southern
      v.                                 * District of Iowa.
                                         *
Sonni Natasha Hernandez,                 *      [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
                   Appellant.            *
                                    ___________

                               Submitted: December 7, 2005
                                  Filed: December 12, 2005
                                   ___________

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Sonni Natasha Hernandez appeals the 120-month sentence the district court*
imposed after Hernandez pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy charge. Hernandez
argues the government acted in bad faith by not filing a motion under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(e) for a departure below the mandatory minimum sentence. We conclude
Hernandez failed to make a substantial threshold showing that the government’s
refusal was “irrational, in bad faith, or based on an unconstitutional motive.” See



      *
        The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
United States v. Davis, 
397 F.3d 672
, 676 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting Wade v. United
States, 
504 U.S. 181
, 186 (1992)). Accordingly, we affirm.
                       ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer