Filed: Jan. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-4192 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Jesus Ibarra-Torres, * District of Minnesota. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: December 29, 2005 Filed: January 5, 2006 _ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jesus Ibarra-Torres appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Having carefully re
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-4192 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Jesus Ibarra-Torres, * District of Minnesota. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: December 29, 2005 Filed: January 5, 2006 _ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jesus Ibarra-Torres appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Having carefully rev..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-4192
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Jesus Ibarra-Torres, * District of Minnesota.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: December 29, 2005
Filed: January 5, 2006
___________
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jesus Ibarra-Torres appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Having carefully reviewed the record, we
agree with the district court that Ibarra-Torres is not entitled to a sentence reduction
based on Amendment 484 to the Sentencing Guidelines because it was in effect when
Ibarra-Torres was sentenced. See U.S.S.G. App. C, amend. 484; United States v.
Alvarez,
210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (per curiam).
1
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-