Filed: Feb. 01, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1003 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Milton George Bigalk, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: January 25, 2006 Filed: February 1, 2006 _ Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A jury found Milton George Bigalk guilty of failing to surrender as ordered to serve a previously imposed federal sentence, in violat
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1003 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Milton George Bigalk, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: January 25, 2006 Filed: February 1, 2006 _ Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A jury found Milton George Bigalk guilty of failing to surrender as ordered to serve a previously imposed federal sentence, in violati..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-1003
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Milton George Bigalk, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 25, 2006
Filed: February 1, 2006
___________
Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
A jury found Milton George Bigalk guilty of failing to surrender as ordered to
serve a previously imposed federal sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. ยง 3146(a)(2).
The district court1 sentenced him to 21 months in prison and 3 years of supervised
release, and he appeals.
Mr. Bigalk challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict, we conclude that
1
The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
it is sufficient. See United States v. Marion,
977 F.2d 1284, 1287 (8th Cir. 1992)
(standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See
8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Mr. Bigalk's pro se "affidavit and demand for charging
affidavits."
______________________________
-2-