Filed: Apr. 13, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1138 _ In re: David M. Austin, * * Debtor, * * - * * Donald E. Waring, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appellant, * * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * David M. Austin, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 7, 2006 Filed: April 13, 2006 _ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Donald Waring appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) reversing the bankruptcy court’s judgmen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1138 _ In re: David M. Austin, * * Debtor, * * - * * Donald E. Waring, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appellant, * * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * David M. Austin, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 7, 2006 Filed: April 13, 2006 _ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Donald Waring appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) reversing the bankruptcy court’s judgment..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-1138
___________
In re: David M. Austin, *
*
Debtor, *
*
--------------------------------------- *
*
Donald E. Waring, * Appeal from the United States
* Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Appellant, *
*
v. * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
David M. Austin, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 7, 2006
Filed: April 13, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Donald Waring appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
(BAP) reversing the bankruptcy court’s judgment excepting from discharge under
11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) a debt allegedly owed to Waring by debtor David Austin.
This court applies the same review standards as the BAP, reviewing the
bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo.
In re Vote,
276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002). Because we agree with the BAP’s
reasoning and conclusion that the bankruptcy court clearly erred in finding that
Waring justifiably relied on a misrepresentation by Austin, we affirm the BAP’s
decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-