Filed: Mar. 08, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2113 _ Lisa Yvette Elam, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Barnes-Jewish Hospital, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 1, 2006 Filed: March 8, 2006 _ Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lisa Yvette Elam appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her action against her former employer, Barnes-Jewish
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2113 _ Lisa Yvette Elam, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Barnes-Jewish Hospital, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 1, 2006 Filed: March 8, 2006 _ Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lisa Yvette Elam appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her action against her former employer, Barnes-Jewish H..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2113
___________
Lisa Yvette Elam, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Missouri.
*
Barnes-Jewish Hospital, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 1, 2006
Filed: March 8, 2006
___________
Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Lisa Yvette Elam appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her action against her former employer, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, under
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act.2 Having
carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court’s analysis of Elam’s
claims, and Elam has provided no basis for reversal. See Woods v. DaimlerChrysler
1
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
2
Elam has abandoned her state-law claim on appeal. See Shade v. City of
Farmington, Minn.,
309 F.3d 1054, 1058 n.6 (8th Cir. 2002).
Corp.,
409 F.3d 984, 990 (8th Cir. 2005) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-