Filed: Mar. 03, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2258 _ Paul A. Culbreath, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Perryman Realty, Inc.; Danny * Eastern District of Arkansas. Perryman; Barbara Perryman; Fulton * Title Company; Karen Plumlee; * [UNPUBLISHED] Bank of Salem, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 28, 2006 Filed: March 3, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Culbreath appeals the district cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2258 _ Paul A. Culbreath, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Perryman Realty, Inc.; Danny * Eastern District of Arkansas. Perryman; Barbara Perryman; Fulton * Title Company; Karen Plumlee; * [UNPUBLISHED] Bank of Salem, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 28, 2006 Filed: March 3, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Culbreath appeals the district cour..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2258
___________
Paul A. Culbreath, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Perryman Realty, Inc.; Danny * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Perryman; Barbara Perryman; Fulton *
Title Company; Karen Plumlee; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Bank of Salem, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 28, 2006
Filed: March 3, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Culbreath appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defendants. Having carefully reviewed the
record, see Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. FAG Bearings Corp.,
335 F.3d 752, 757 (8th Cir.
2003) (de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court that Culbreath
1
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
is collaterally estopped from bringing his claim, for the reasons explained in the
district court’s opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-