Filed: Jun. 26, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2763 _ In re: Mark Henry Foss, * * Debtor. * - * * Mark Henry Foss, * * Appeal from the United States Appellant, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Hall County Child Support Office, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 23, 2006 Filed: June 26, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mark Foss appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP) decision affirming the
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2763 _ In re: Mark Henry Foss, * * Debtor. * - * * Mark Henry Foss, * * Appeal from the United States Appellant, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Hall County Child Support Office, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 23, 2006 Filed: June 26, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mark Foss appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP) decision affirming the b..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2763
___________
In re: Mark Henry Foss, *
*
Debtor. *
------------------- *
*
Mark Henry Foss, *
* Appeal from the United States
Appellant, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
* for the Eighth Circuit.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Hall County Child Support Office, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 23, 2006
Filed: June 26, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mark Foss appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP) decision
affirming the bankruptcy court’s1 dismissal of his adversary proceeding with
prejudice. We agree with the BAP that the bankruptcy court abstained from hearing
1
The Honorable Timothy J. Mahoney, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nebraska.
the issues raised by Foss in his pending state court proceedings. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1334(b)-(c)(1) (generally, federal courts have original but not exclusive jurisdiction
of all civil proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in or related to cases under
title 11, but may abstain from hearing such proceeding in interest of comity with state
courts or respect for state law). Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction to review
the bankruptcy court’s decision to abstain. See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d) (decision to
abstain under § 1334(c)(1) is not reviewable by courts of appeals). We therefore
dismiss this appeal.
______________________________
-2-