Filed: Jul. 31, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3087 _ Radu Rasidescu, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. University of Minnesota; University of * Minnesota Graduate School, Twin * [UNPUBLISHED] Cities Campus; University of * Minnesota, School of Physics and * Astronomy, Department of Astronomy; * Evan Skillman; Leonard Kuhi; * Liliya L.R. Williams, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 19, 2006 Filed: July 31, 2006 _
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3087 _ Radu Rasidescu, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. University of Minnesota; University of * Minnesota Graduate School, Twin * [UNPUBLISHED] Cities Campus; University of * Minnesota, School of Physics and * Astronomy, Department of Astronomy; * Evan Skillman; Leonard Kuhi; * Liliya L.R. Williams, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 19, 2006 Filed: July 31, 2006 _ ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3087
___________
Radu Rasidescu, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
University of Minnesota; University of *
Minnesota Graduate School, Twin * [UNPUBLISHED]
Cities Campus; University of *
Minnesota, School of Physics and *
Astronomy, Department of Astronomy; *
Evan Skillman; Leonard Kuhi; *
Liliya L.R. Williams, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 19, 2006
Filed: July 31, 2006
___________
Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Radu Rasidescu appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. Reviewing de novo, see Mosby v. Ligon,
418 F.3d 927,
1
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L.
Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
931 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that dismissal was proper, because Rasidescu alleged
insufficient facts to establish diversity or federal-question jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1331, 1332. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-