Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dr. R.C. Samanta Roy v. Star Tribune, 05-3335 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 05-3335 Visitors: 30
Filed: Oct. 23, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3335 _ Dr. R.C. Samanta Roy Institute of * Science and Technology, a Wisconsin * non-stock corporation; Midwest Oil * of Minnesota, LLC, * * Appellants, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the The Star Tribune Company, * District of Minnesota. f/k/a Cowles Media Company, * d/b/a Star Tribune, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 6, 2006 Filed: October 23, 2006 _ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON,
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 05-3335
                                   ___________

Dr. R.C. Samanta Roy Institute of       *
Science and Technology, a Wisconsin     *
non-stock corporation; Midwest Oil      *
of Minnesota, LLC,                      *
                                        *
             Appellants,                *
                                        *
      v.                                * Appeal from the United States
                                        * District Court for the
The Star Tribune Company,               * District of Minnesota.
f/k/a Cowles Media Company,             *
d/b/a Star Tribune,                     * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                        *
             Appellee.                  *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: October 6, 2006
                                Filed: October 23, 2006
                                 ___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       The Dr. R.C. Samanta Roy Institute of Science and Technology and Midwest
Oil of Minnesota, LLC appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1981
action. We agree with the district court that plaintiffs did not state a section 1981

      1
      The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
claim, based on the reasoning of Phelps v. Wichita Eagle-Beacon, 
886 F.2d 1262
,
1267 (10th Cir. 1989), and thus we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellee’s
motion for summary dismissal of the appeal.
                       ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer