Filed: Feb. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3752 _ Yoram Raz, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert M. Mueller, Director, United * Western District of Arkansas. States Department of Justice; United * States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * - Yoram Raz, * * Appellant, * * v. * * United States of America, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 7, 2007 Filed: February 9, 2007 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judge
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3752 _ Yoram Raz, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert M. Mueller, Director, United * Western District of Arkansas. States Department of Justice; United * States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * - Yoram Raz, * * Appellant, * * v. * * United States of America, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 7, 2007 Filed: February 9, 2007 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3752
___________
Yoram Raz, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Robert M. Mueller, Director, United * Western District of Arkansas.
States Department of Justice; United *
States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
----------------------------------------
Yoram Raz, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
United States of America, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 7, 2007
Filed: February 9, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Yoram Raz challenges the adverse judgment entered by the district court1 after
a bench trial on Raz’s claims based on the FBI’s alleged campaign of surveillance and
harassment of him. For reversal, Raz argues the district court abused its discretion in
limiting essential discovery, in limiting evidence, and in refusing to sanction the
opposing parties. Following careful review, we find no abuse of the district court’s
discretion with regard to these matters, and we affirm for the reasons cited in the
district court’s thorough memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas.
-2-