Filed: Jul. 10, 2007
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2017
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1070 _ Calvin Allen, doing business * as Brick House Productions, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. State of Missouri, Department of * Public Safety, Div. of Liquor Control; * [UNPUBLISHED] Jim Anderson, Individually; City of * Kennett, Missouri; City Counsel, * Kennett, Missouri; Charles D. Brown, * Individual and Official Capacity; * Terry M. McVey, Individu
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1070 _ Calvin Allen, doing business * as Brick House Productions, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. State of Missouri, Department of * Public Safety, Div. of Liquor Control; * [UNPUBLISHED] Jim Anderson, Individually; City of * Kennett, Missouri; City Counsel, * Kennett, Missouri; Charles D. Brown, * Individual and Official Capacity; * Terry M. McVey, Individua..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1070
___________
Calvin Allen, doing business *
as Brick House Productions, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
State of Missouri, Department of *
Public Safety, Div. of Liquor Control; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Jim Anderson, Individually; City of *
Kennett, Missouri; City Counsel, *
Kennett, Missouri; Charles D. Brown, *
Individual and Official Capacity; *
Terry M. McVey, Individual and *
Official Capacity; Ronnie Morgan, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 5, 2007
Filed: July 10, 2007
___________
Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Calvin Allen appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment in his action brought
under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 for the denial of a liquor license. Following
careful review, see Casazza v. Kiser,
313 F.3d 414, 418 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo
review of dismissal); Dulany v. Carnahan,
132 F.3d 1234, 1237 (8th Cir. 1997) (de
novo review of summary judgment), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We do not consider Allen’s tendered “Motion to Vacate,
Set Aside, and Remand Summary Judgment Request Oral Argument,” and order that
it be stricken.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-