Filed: Jun. 08, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1328 _ Cynthia Miller, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Gloria Powell; Odell Embry; Hilda * Canada; Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED] Human Services, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: June 6, 2007 Filed: June 8, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cynthia Miller appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary jud
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1328 _ Cynthia Miller, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Gloria Powell; Odell Embry; Hilda * Canada; Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED] Human Services, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: June 6, 2007 Filed: June 8, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cynthia Miller appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judg..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1328
___________
Cynthia Miller, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Gloria Powell; Odell Embry; Hilda *
Canada; Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED]
Human Services, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 6, 2007
Filed: June 8, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Cynthia Miller appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her action alleging unlawful race discrimination and retaliation, in
violation of Title VII. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Kratzer v. Rockwell
Collins, Inc.,
398 F.3d 1040, 1043 (8th Cir. 2005) (de novo standard of review), we
1
The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, United States District Judge for the District
of North Dakota, sitting by designation in the Eastern District of Arkansas.
agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Miller’s pending motion.
______________________________
-2-