Filed: Sep. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2161 _ William R. Cody, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Daryl R. Slykhuis; Dennis Block; * Douglas T. Loen; Clifton Fantroy; * [UNPUBLISHED] Douglas L. Weber, in their individual * and official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 4, 2007 Filed: September 11, 2007 _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. South Dakota Sta
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2161 _ William R. Cody, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Daryl R. Slykhuis; Dennis Block; * Douglas T. Loen; Clifton Fantroy; * [UNPUBLISHED] Douglas L. Weber, in their individual * and official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 4, 2007 Filed: September 11, 2007 _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. South Dakota Stat..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2161
___________
William R. Cody, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Daryl R. Slykhuis; Dennis Block; *
Douglas T. Loen; Clifton Fantroy; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Douglas L. Weber, in their individual *
and official capacities, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 4, 2007
Filed: September 11, 2007
___________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
South Dakota State Penitentiary (SDSP) inmate William Cody appeals the
district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
against SDSP officials, alleging denial of access to courts. Having carefully reviewed
the record and considered Cody’s arguments, we conclude that the district court
1
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
properly granted summary judgment and that there is no basis for reversal. See
Johnson v. Blaukat,
453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-