United States Court of Appeals
                          FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                  ___________

                                  No. 06-2472
                                  ___________

Jeffery K. Caswell; Victoria           *
Caswell; Russ Dreyer, on behalf of     *
themselves and others similarly        *
situated,                              *
                                       * Appeal from the United States
            Appellants,                * District Court for the
                                       * District of Minnesota.
      v.                               *
                                       * [UNPUBLISHED]
City of Bloomington,                   *
                                       *
            Appellee.                  *
                                  ___________

                            Submitted: December 11, 2006
                               Filed: January 26, 2007
                                ___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, MURPHY and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                             ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Jeffery K. Caswell, Victoria Caswell, and Russ Dreyer appeal the district
court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their action challenging a City of
Bloomington zoning ordinance regulating the land use around a newly constructed
runway at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Having carefully reviewed


      1
      The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
the record, see Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of Eden Prairie, 

, 798
(8th Cir. 2006) (de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court’s well-
reasoned opinion that, due to the lack of redressability, the appellants lack standing
in this matter. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 

, 560-61 (1992) (to
establish standing, plaintiff must demonstrate, inter alia, the likelihood that a
favorable decision by the court will redress the alleged injury); Planned Parenthood
of Mid-Mo. & E. Kan., Inc. v. Ehlmann, 

, 577 (8th Cir. 1998) (to
establish redressability, plaintiff must make more than “merely speculative” showing
that court can grant relief to injury).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

                       ______________________________




                                         -2-