Filed: May 09, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2673 _ Michael Carmie Antonelli, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Linda Sanders, Warden, FCI, * Forrest City, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 27, 2007 Filed: May 9, 2007 _ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Carmie Antonelli appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. §
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2673 _ Michael Carmie Antonelli, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Linda Sanders, Warden, FCI, * Forrest City, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 27, 2007 Filed: May 9, 2007 _ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Carmie Antonelli appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2673
___________
Michael Carmie Antonelli, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Linda Sanders, Warden, FCI, *
Forrest City, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 27, 2007
Filed: May 9, 2007
___________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Carmie Antonelli appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his motions for relief from judgment and
for a protective order. We conclude that the dismissal of the section 2241 petition was
proper for the reasons explained by the district court, see Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo standard of review), and that the district court
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions, see Sanders v. Clemco Indus.,
862
F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988) (relief from judgment); Goff v. Harper,
60 F.3d 518,
520-21 (8th Cir. 1995) (injunctive relief).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
______________________________
-2-