Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3776 _ Ronald L. Satterlee, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Internal Revenue Service; United States * Western District of Missouri. of America; Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 25, 2007 Filed: October 25, 2007 _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3776 _ Ronald L. Satterlee, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Internal Revenue Service; United States * Western District of Missouri. of America; Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 25, 2007 Filed: October 25, 2007 _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3776
___________
Ronald L. Satterlee, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Internal Revenue Service; United States * Western District of Missouri.
of America; Commissioner of Internal *
Revenue Service, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 25, 2007
Filed: October 25, 2007
___________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of
his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax
deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court’s de novo
review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court.
See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.,
395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir.
1
The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
2005) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee’s motion to reconsider.
See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates,
92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir. 1996)
(standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-