Filed: Dec. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1346 _ Derrick Hobson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Captain Steed, Garland County * Detention Center; Deputy Wynn; * [UNPUBLISHED] Deputy Shirley; Deputy Dunn; * Deputy Worley; Deputy Grinness, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 17, 2007 Filed: December 21, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Former Arkansas pret
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1346 _ Derrick Hobson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Captain Steed, Garland County * Detention Center; Deputy Wynn; * [UNPUBLISHED] Deputy Shirley; Deputy Dunn; * Deputy Worley; Deputy Grinness, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 17, 2007 Filed: December 21, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Former Arkansas pretr..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1346
___________
Derrick Hobson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Arkansas.
Captain Steed, Garland County *
Detention Center; Deputy Wynn; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Deputy Shirley; Deputy Dunn; *
Deputy Worley; Deputy Grinness, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: December 17, 2007
Filed: December 21, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Former Arkansas pretrial detainee Derrick Hobson appeals the district court’s1
adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from an
accidental fall from a top bunk during incarceration and from the medical treatment
he received thereafter. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Hobson’s
1
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
arguments, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment on
his claims that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his reasonable safety and
deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. See Johnson v. Hamilton,
452
F.3d 967, 971-72 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). We decline to consider
additional claims that he asserts for the first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry,
364
F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-