Filed: Apr. 09, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2997 _ Glenn S. Cohen, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Beachside Two-I Homeowners’ * Association; Fredrick R. Krietzman; * [UNPUBLISHED] Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, a * Professional Association; U.S. * Bancorp, doing business as U.S. * Bank Home Mortgage, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: April 3, 2008 Filed: April 9, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2997 _ Glenn S. Cohen, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Beachside Two-I Homeowners’ * Association; Fredrick R. Krietzman; * [UNPUBLISHED] Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, a * Professional Association; U.S. * Bancorp, doing business as U.S. * Bank Home Mortgage, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: April 3, 2008 Filed: April 9, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2997
___________
Glenn S. Cohen, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Beachside Two-I Homeowners’ *
Association; Fredrick R. Krietzman; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, a *
Professional Association; U.S. *
Bancorp, doing business as U.S. *
Bank Home Mortgage, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 3, 2008
Filed: April 9, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Glenn S. Cohen appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his lawsuit brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and state law.
Having conducted de novo review of the record and the district court’s construction
1
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
of state law, see Cross v. Monett R-I Bd. of Educ.,
431 F.3d 606, 610 (8th Cir. 2005),
we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, but we
modify the dismissal of the breach-of-contract claims against Beachside Two-I
Homeowners’ Association to be without prejudice, see Labickas v. Ark. State Univ.,
78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
______________________________
-2-