Filed: Mar. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3797 _ Dorisene Anderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Target Corporation, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 3, 2008 Filed: March 10, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her forme
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3797 _ Dorisene Anderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Target Corporation, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 3, 2008 Filed: March 10, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3797
___________
Dorisene Anderson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Target Corporation, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 3, 2008
Filed: March 10, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former employer,
Target Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Anderson’s
arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman,
289 F.3d 517,
520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
1
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.