Filed: Jan. 07, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1360 _ Murphy M. Hubbard, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. United States, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 28, 2007 Filed: January 7, 2008 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Murphy M. Hubbard appeals the district court’s1 denial of his petition to quash an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summons. Having car
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1360 _ Murphy M. Hubbard, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. United States, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 28, 2007 Filed: January 7, 2008 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Murphy M. Hubbard appeals the district court’s1 denial of his petition to quash an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summons. Having care..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1360
___________
Murphy M. Hubbard, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
United States, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 28, 2007
Filed: January 7, 2008
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Murphy M. Hubbard appeals the district court’s1 denial of his petition to quash
an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summons. Having carefully reviewed the record
and considered Hubbard’s arguments, we conclude that the district court did not
clearly err in denying the petition. See United States v. Kaiser,
397 F.3d 641, 643 (8th
Cir. 2005). We reject Hubbard’s due process argument and note that the district court
in fact considered his untimely reply to the IRS’s show-cause response. We decline
1
The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
to consider additional claims that Hubbard asserts for the first time on appeal. See
Stone v. Harry,
364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-