Filed: May 21, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1818 _ Eugene Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Postal Service, (U.S.) Inspector * General; Norman Gilcrest, Postmaster, * [UNPUBLISHED] United States Postal Service, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 15, 2008 Filed: May 21, 2008 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1818 _ Eugene Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Postal Service, (U.S.) Inspector * General; Norman Gilcrest, Postmaster, * [UNPUBLISHED] United States Postal Service, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 15, 2008 Filed: May 21, 2008 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of h..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1818
___________
Eugene Smith, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Postal Service, (U.S.) Inspector *
General; Norman Gilcrest, Postmaster, * [UNPUBLISHED]
United States Postal Service, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 15, 2008
Filed: May 21, 2008
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his case for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson,
516 F.3d
1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude dismissal was proper. We affirm the
judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.