Filed: Jul. 24, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-2511 _ James Allen Nunley, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Department of Justice, United States of * America; Drug Enforcement Agency; * [UNPUBLISHED] Officer Halfacre, Individually and in * his official capacities; Federal * Narcotics Agents, Individually and in * their official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 14, 2008 Filed: July 24, 2008 (C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-2511 _ James Allen Nunley, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Department of Justice, United States of * America; Drug Enforcement Agency; * [UNPUBLISHED] Officer Halfacre, Individually and in * his official capacities; Federal * Narcotics Agents, Individually and in * their official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 14, 2008 Filed: July 24, 2008 (Co..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2511
___________
James Allen Nunley, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
Department of Justice, United States of *
America; Drug Enforcement Agency; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Officer Halfacre, Individually and in *
his official capacities; Federal *
Narcotics Agents, Individually and in *
their official capacities, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 14, 2008
Filed: July 24, 2008 (Corrected 7/25/08)
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal after a remand, see Nunley v. Dep’t of Justice,
425 F.3d 1132 (8th
Cir. 2005), James Nunley challenges the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action to set aside administrative forfeitures. Upon de novo review,
1
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas.
see Bloom v. Metro Heart Group of St. Louis, Inc.,
440 F.3d 1025, 1028 (8th Cir.
2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the
district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-