Filed: Jan. 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-2850 _ APS, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Labor; Office * of Administrative Hearings, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 29, 2008 Filed: January 14, 2009 _ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Appellant “APS” appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint brought under the America
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-2850 _ APS, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Labor; Office * of Administrative Hearings, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 29, 2008 Filed: January 14, 2009 _ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Appellant “APS” appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint brought under the American..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2850
___________
APS, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Minnesota Department of Labor; Office *
of Administrative Hearings, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: December 29, 2008
Filed: January 14, 2009
___________
Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Appellant “APS” appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint brought
under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful review, we affirm for the
reasons explained by the district court. See Carter v. Arkansas,
392 F.3d 965, 968
(8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Mangan v. Weinberger,
848
F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)). Additionally, the
1
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
district court properly denied leave to further amend the complaint, also for the
reasons explained by the court.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-