Filed: Jun. 10, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3623 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Roberta Sue Tolbert; A&R Equity * Holdings, * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants, * * Alvin A. Tolbert, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 3, 2009 Filed: June 10, 2009 _ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Alvin A. Tolbert appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary j
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3623 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Roberta Sue Tolbert; A&R Equity * Holdings, * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants, * * Alvin A. Tolbert, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 3, 2009 Filed: June 10, 2009 _ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Alvin A. Tolbert appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary ju..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-3623
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
Roberta Sue Tolbert; A&R Equity *
Holdings, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendants, *
*
Alvin A. Tolbert, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: June 3, 2009
Filed: June 10, 2009
___________
Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Alvin A. Tolbert appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in this tax action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat,
453
F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgement was
appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court, see Gentry v. United States, 962
1
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas.
F.2d 555, 557-58 (6th Cir. 1992). We also conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in declining to amend the judgment. See Christensen v. Qwest
Pension Plan,
462 F.3d 913, 920 (8th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending
motions for sanctions.
______________________________
-2-