Filed: Feb. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3868 _ John Hagenaar; Shirley Hagenaar, * * Appellants, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Andrew County Sheriff’s Department; * Western District of Missouri. Gary Howard; Robert Elam; City of * Savannah; Janet Hatcher; Ron * [UNPUBLISHED] Holliday, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 2, 2009 Filed: February 23, 2009 _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. John and Shirley H
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3868 _ John Hagenaar; Shirley Hagenaar, * * Appellants, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Andrew County Sheriff’s Department; * Western District of Missouri. Gary Howard; Robert Elam; City of * Savannah; Janet Hatcher; Ron * [UNPUBLISHED] Holliday, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 2, 2009 Filed: February 23, 2009 _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. John and Shirley Ha..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-3868
___________
John Hagenaar; Shirley Hagenaar, *
*
Appellants, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Andrew County Sheriff’s Department; * Western District of Missouri.
Gary Howard; Robert Elam; City of *
Savannah; Janet Hatcher; Ron * [UNPUBLISHED]
Holliday, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 2, 2009
Filed: February 23, 2009
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
John and Shirley Hagenaar appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Following careful de novo review,
we conclude dismissal was proper because the Hagenaars failed to state a claim for
relief against any named defendant. See LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv.,
450 F.3d 797,
1
The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
799 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review); Phipps v. FDIC,
417 F.3d 1006, 1010 (8th
Cir. 2005) (this court may affirm for any reason supported by record).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-