Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Randy Teinert v. Rachel Paulos, 08-2605 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 08-2605 Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2605 _ Randy Craig Teinert, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Rachel K. Paulos, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 3, 2009 Filed: August 14, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 08-2605
                                    ___________

Randy Craig Teinert,                     *
                                         *
             Appellant,                  *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                 * District Court for the
                                         * District of Minnesota.
Rachel K. Paulos,                        *
                                         * [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellee.                   *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: August 3, 2009
                                 Filed: August 14, 2009
                                  ___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing his complaint
for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Hastings
v. Wilson, 
516 F.3d 1055
, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that dismissal was
proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                           ___________________________



      1
      The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer