Filed: Aug. 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2605 _ Randy Craig Teinert, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Rachel K. Paulos, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 3, 2009 Filed: August 14, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2605 _ Randy Craig Teinert, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Rachel K. Paulos, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 3, 2009 Filed: August 14, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2605
___________
Randy Craig Teinert, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Rachel K. Paulos, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 3, 2009
Filed: August 14, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing his complaint
for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Hastings
v. Wilson,
516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that dismissal was
proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
___________________________
1
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.