United States Court of Appeals
                             FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 08-2847
                                    ___________

David Johnson,                           *
                                         *
             Appellant,                  *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                 * District Court for the Eastern
                                         * District of Arkansas.
Port City Janitors’ Supply               *
& Paper Company, Inc.,                   * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
             Appellee.                   *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: October 5, 2009
                                 Filed: October 8, 2009
                                  ___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

PER CURIAM.

       David Johnson appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of
his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV,
Inc., 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the
reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse



      1
       The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 

,
775 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

                       ______________________________




                                        -2-