Filed: Nov. 13, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2871 _ Bobby Joe Olles, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED] Harley Lappin; Ray Carnahan, * United States Marshal Service; * Randy Johnson, Sheriff, Pulaski * County Detention Facility, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 2, 2009 Filed: November 13, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and S
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2871 _ Bobby Joe Olles, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED] Harley Lappin; Ray Carnahan, * United States Marshal Service; * Randy Johnson, Sheriff, Pulaski * County Detention Facility, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 2, 2009 Filed: November 13, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SM..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2871
___________
Bobby Joe Olles, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Harley Lappin; Ray Carnahan, *
United States Marshal Service; *
Randy Johnson, Sheriff, Pulaski *
County Detention Facility, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 2, 2009
Filed: November 13, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Bobby Joe Olles (Olles) appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Having carefully reviewed the record and
Olles’s arguments, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Jones
1
The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
v. Swanson,
512 F.3d 1045, 1048 (8th Cir. 2008) (explaining that the district court has
wide discretion in ruling on a Rule 60(b) motion and will be reversed only for clear
abuse of that discretion). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-