Filed: May 11, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2990 _ David E. Jones, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Geoffrey Bullard, Corporal, Faulkner * County Sheriff’s Office; Karl Byrd, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sheriff, Faulkner County Sheriff’s * Office, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 5, 2009 Filed: May 11, 2009 _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. David Jones appeals the district court’
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-2990 _ David E. Jones, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Geoffrey Bullard, Corporal, Faulkner * County Sheriff’s Office; Karl Byrd, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sheriff, Faulkner County Sheriff’s * Office, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 5, 2009 Filed: May 11, 2009 _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. David Jones appeals the district court’s..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2990
___________
David E. Jones, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Geoffrey Bullard, Corporal, Faulkner *
County Sheriff’s Office; Karl Byrd, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Sheriff, Faulkner County Sheriff’s *
Office, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 5, 2009
Filed: May 11, 2009
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Jones appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for injunctive
relief in his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude that the district court did not
clearly err in its factual determinations, err on the law, or abuse its discretion in
1
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of
Arkansas.
denying Jones’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See United Indus. Corp. v.
Clorox Co.,
140 F.3d 1175, 1178-79 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-