Filed: Dec. 09, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-3250 _ David Lee Daniels, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Sheriff Keith Ferguson, in both his * individual and official capacities; Sue * [UNPUBLISHED] McDonald, in both her individual and * official capacities; Dr. Neil Mullins, in * both his individual and official * capacities; Cpl. Powell, in both his * individual and official capacities; Cpl. * Reams, i
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-3250 _ David Lee Daniels, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Sheriff Keith Ferguson, in both his * individual and official capacities; Sue * [UNPUBLISHED] McDonald, in both her individual and * official capacities; Dr. Neil Mullins, in * both his individual and official * capacities; Cpl. Powell, in both his * individual and official capacities; Cpl. * Reams, in..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-3250
___________
David Lee Daniels, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
Sheriff Keith Ferguson, in both his *
individual and official capacities; Sue * [UNPUBLISHED]
McDonald, in both her individual and *
official capacities; Dr. Neil Mullins, in *
both his individual and official *
capacities; Cpl. Powell, in both his *
individual and official capacities; Cpl. *
Reams, in both his individual and *
official capacities; Officer Hernandez, *
in both his individual and official *
capacities; Officer Adams, in both his *
individual and official capacities, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: December 1, 2009
Filed: December 9, 2009
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate David Daniels appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action following an evidentiary hearing. Having carefully reviewed the
record and considered Daniels’s arguments, see Johnson v. Bi-State Justice Ctr.,
12
F.3d 133, 135-37 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review; after evidentiary hearing,
dismissal is proper if evidence does not present sufficient disagreement to require
submission to jury but is so one-sided that one party must prevail as matter of law),
we find no basis for reversal, see Bell v. Wolfish,
441 U.S. 520, 535-40 (8th Cir. 1979)
(standard applicable to conditions-of-confinement claims by pretrial detainees).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
-2-