Filed: Nov. 12, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1368 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Larry D. Saddler, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 10, 2009 Filed: November 12, 2009 _ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Larry Saddler appeals following the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a revocation sentence
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1368 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Larry D. Saddler, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 10, 2009 Filed: November 12, 2009 _ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Larry Saddler appeals following the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a revocation sentence o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1368
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Western District of Missouri.
*
Larry D. Saddler, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 10, 2009
Filed: November 12, 2009
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Larry Saddler appeals following the district court’s1 order revoking his
supervised release and imposing a revocation sentence of 24 months in prison. Upon
careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking
supervised release, see United States v. Edwards,
400 F.3d 591, 592 (8th Cir. 2005)
(per curiam); and we also conclude the revocation sentence is not unreasonable, see
18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, comment. (n.4); United States v. Tyson,
413
F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review); United States v.
1
The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
Thunder,
553 F.3d 605, 608-09 (8th Cir. 2009) (affirming sentence exceeding
advisory Guidelines revocation range).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-