Filed: Jan. 05, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1610 _ Joe B. Butler, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI — * Forrest City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 28, 2009 Filed: January 5, 2010 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Joe Butler appeals the district court’s1 denial without prejudice of his petition for a writ
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1610 _ Joe B. Butler, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI — * Forrest City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 28, 2009 Filed: January 5, 2010 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Joe Butler appeals the district court’s1 denial without prejudice of his petition for a writ ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1610
___________
Joe B. Butler, Jr., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI — *
Forrest City, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 28, 2009
Filed: January 5, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Joe Butler appeals the district court’s1 denial without prejudice
of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Upon careful
review, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief for failure
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
to exhaust administrative remedies. See Kendrick v. Carlson,
995 F.2d 1440, 1447
(8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-