Filed: Feb. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1961 _ Vincent Nathaniel Cannady, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. First Comp, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 16, 2010 Filed: February 25, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Vincent Cannady appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se discrimination action against a pros
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1961 _ Vincent Nathaniel Cannady, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. First Comp, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 16, 2010 Filed: February 25, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Vincent Cannady appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se discrimination action against a prosp..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1961
___________
Vincent Nathaniel Cannady, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
First Comp, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 16, 2010
Filed: February 25, 2010
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Vincent Cannady appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his pro se discrimination action against a prospective employer. After
careful de novo review, see Arraleh v. County of Ramsey,
461 F.3d 967, 974 (8th Cir.
2006) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the
reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.