Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ibrahima Balde v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 09-2054 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 09-2054
Filed: May 27, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-2054 _ Ibrahima Mamadou Balde, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Board of Immigration * Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney * General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: March 8, 2010 Filed: May 27, 2010 _ Before BYE, ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ibrahima Mamadou Balde petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) t
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                          FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                     ___________

                                     No. 09-2054
                                     ___________

Ibrahima Mamadou Balde,                   *
                                          *
            Petitioner,                   *
                                          * Petition for Review of an Order
      v.                                  * of the Board of Immigration
                                          * Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney             *
General of the United States,             * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                          *
            Respondent.                   *
                                     ___________

                                Submitted: March 8, 2010
                                   Filed: May 27, 2010
                                    ___________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Ibrahima Mamadou Balde petitions for review of a decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that refused to reopen Balde’s removal proceedings in
response to an untimely motion to reopen filed by Balde. Balde argues that the BIA
should have exercised its sua sponte power to reopen the proceedings, pursuant to 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). The BIA’s decision whether to exercise that power, however, is
committed to agency discretion by law, and therefore unreviewable. Tamenut v.
Mukasey, 
521 F.3d 1000
, 1005 (8th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2).
To the extent that Balde contends separately that the BIA “abused its discretion” by
denying his untimely motion to reopen, the argument is simply another way of
challenging the agency’s refusal to act sua sponte. See Barrie v. Holder, 353 F. App’x
523, 524 (2d Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
                      ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer