Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-2949 _ Freya Ferrell, On behalf of D.W.C., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Social Security * Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 7, 2010 Filed: April 12, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Freya Ferrell, on behalf of her minor son D.W.C., appeals the district court’s1 order aff
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-2949 _ Freya Ferrell, On behalf of D.W.C., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Social Security * Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 7, 2010 Filed: April 12, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Freya Ferrell, on behalf of her minor son D.W.C., appeals the district court’s1 order affi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-2949
___________
Freya Ferrell, On behalf of D.W.C., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
Michael J. Astrue, Social Security *
Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 7, 2010
Filed: April 12, 2010
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Freya Ferrell, on behalf of her minor son D.W.C., appeals the district court’s1
order affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security
income. Following careful de novo review, we conclude that the Commissioner’s
findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, see Moore
1
The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart,
413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir. 2005), and we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-