United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 09-3278
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
             Appellee,                  *
                                        *
      v.                                * Appeal from the United States
                                        * District Court for the
Vernice Christian,                      * Western District of Arkansas.
                                        *
             Appellant.                 * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: February 17, 2010
                                Filed: February 24, 2010
                                 ___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

       In this direct criminal appeal, Vernice Christian challenges the reasonableness
of the twelve-month, within-Guidelines-range sentence that the District Court1
imposed upon revoking his supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude that
the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 

, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (noting that revocation sentences are reviewed
for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 

(2005)); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (2006) (setting statutory maximum revocation

      1
        The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
sentences and requiring that a court consider certain of the factors set forth in 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a) before imposing a revocation sentence); United States v. Perkins,

, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (noting that a district court need not make
specific findings on the § 3553(a) factors in a revocation proceeding and that a
revocation sentence within the Guidelines range is accorded a presumption of
reasonableness).

      We affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw.
                     ______________________________




                                        -2-