Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 09-3933 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 09-3933 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-3933 _ Sokhna Kane, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney * General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: August 13, 2010 Filed: August 25, 2010 _ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                          FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                     ___________

                                     No. 09-3933
                                     ___________

Sokhna Kane,                              *
                                          *
            Petitioner,                   *
                                          * Petition for Review of
      v.                                  * an Order of the Board
                                          * of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney             *
General of the United States,             * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                          *
            Respondent.                   *
                                     ___________

                                Submitted: August 13, 2010
                                   Filed: August 25, 2010
                                    ___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her
motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its
discretion. See Clifton v. Holder, 
598 F.3d 486
, 490-91 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of
review); Tamenut v. Mukasey, 
521 F.3d 1000
, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (en
banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 
427 F.3d 1160
,
1162 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hernandez-Moran v. Gonzales, 
408 F.3d 496
, 499-500 (8th Cir. 2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review.
                        ______________________________

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer