Filed: Oct. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2628 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Yamil Rivera-Kader, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Llamil Kader, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 28, 2010 Filed: October 29, 2010 _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s1 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to c
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2628 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Yamil Rivera-Kader, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Llamil Kader, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 28, 2010 Filed: October 29, 2010 _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s1 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to co..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2628
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Nebraska.
*
Yamil Rivera-Kader, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED]
Llamil Kader, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: October 28, 2010
Filed: October 29, 2010
___________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s1 order denying his petition for
a writ of mandamus to compel the government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence for substantial assistance.
The district court did not abuse its discretion: among other reasons, Rivera-
Kader failed to establish that he had a clear and indisputable right to a Rule 35(b)
1
The HONORABLE LAURIE SMITH CAMP, United States District Judge for
the District of Nebraska.
motion because his plea agreement reserved to the government the discretion whether
to file such a motion. See In re MidAmerican Energy Co.,
286 F.3d 483, 486 (8th Cir.
2002) (per curiam) (standard of review); In re SDDS, Inc.,
97 F.3d 1030, 1034 (8th
Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-