Filed: Feb. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2505 _ George Walter Carlisle, Jr., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * St. Charles Community College, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 21, 2011 Filed: February 1, 2011 _ Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. George Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment disc
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2505 _ George Walter Carlisle, Jr., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * St. Charles Community College, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 21, 2011 Filed: February 1, 2011 _ Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. George Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discr..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2505
___________
George Walter Carlisle, Jr., *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Missouri.
*
St. Charles Community College, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 21, 2011
Filed: February 1, 2011
___________
Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
George Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment discrimination action against St. Charles Community
College. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the summary judgment order because
this appeal is untimely as to the final judgment, and Carlisle’s post-judgment motion
for relief from judgment was not filed in time to toll the time to appeal. See Dill v.
Gen. Am. Life Ins. Co.,
525 F.3d 612, 619-20 (8th Cir. 2008). This court finds no
1
The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to deny the post-judgment motion.
See Arnold v. Wood,
238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-