Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tony Dam v. Graco, Inc., 10-2737 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 10-2737 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2737 _ Tony Dam, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Graco, Inc.; Jim Badzinski, Manager, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. * _ Submitted: January 18, 2011 Filed: January 19, 2011 _ Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Tony Dam appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action against his fo
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                          FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 10-2737
                                   ___________

Tony Dam,                             *
                                      *
             Appellant,               *
                                      * Appeal from the United States
      v.                              * District Court for the
                                      * District of Minnesota.
Graco, Inc.; Jim Badzinski, Manager, *
                                      * [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellees.               *
                                 ___________

                             Submitted: January 18, 2011
                                Filed: January 19, 2011
                                 ___________

Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Tony Dam appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in
his employment-discrimination action against his former employer Graco, Inc.
(Graco). After careful de novo review, see Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 
372 F.3d 979
, 982 (8th Cir. 2004), this court concludes that summary judgment was properly
granted. Even assuming Dam made a prima facie case of discrimination, Graco
presented a valid, non-discriminatory reason for his termination – poor job
performance that did not improve – and Dam failed to present a triable issue of fact

      1
      The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
on whether that reason was a pretext for discrimination. See Richmond v. Bd. of
Regents of the Univ. of Minn., 
957 F.2d 595
, 598 (8th Cir. 1992) (poor job
performance is valid, non-discriminatory reason for termination; defendants produced
documentation that plaintiff’s performance was unsatisfactory, plaintiff ignored
progressive warnings, and performance did not improve).

      This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer