Filed: Mar. 09, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2743 _ Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. * _ Submitted: March 3, 2011 Filed: March 9, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2743 _ Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. * _ Submitted: March 3, 2011 Filed: March 9, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) af..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2743
___________
Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the Board
* of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: March 3, 2011
Filed: March 9, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Sara Esther Ramos Vasquez petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge’s denial
of her application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the
discretionary determination that Ramos Vasquez failed to show her removal would
result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her children who were United
States citizens. See Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey,
509 F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir.
2007). We also lack jurisdiction to consider Ramos Vasquez’s assertion that the
impact of her health problems was ignored, because she did not exhaust this issue
before the BIA. See Sultani v. Gonzales,
455 F.3d 878, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
______________________________