Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas Rea v. Wal-Mart Store 1105, 10-3103 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 10-3103 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-3103 _ Thomas Rea, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Wal-Mart Store 1105, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 14, 2011 Filed: March 29, 2011 _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Thomas Rea appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his disability-discrimination action. After careful de novo re
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                          FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 10-3103
                                   ___________

Thomas Rea,                             *
                                        *
             Appellant,                 *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Wal-Mart Store 1105,                    *
                                        * [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellee.                  *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: March 14, 2011
                                Filed: March 29, 2011
                                 ___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Thomas Rea appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his disability-discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v.
Blaukat, 
453 F.3d 1108
, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment
was proper. The undisputed evidence showed neither an adverse employment action,
see Fenney v. Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Co., 
327 F.3d 707
, 711-12 (8th Cir. 2003)
(elements for prima facie case of failure-to-accommodate claim under Americans with



      1
       The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
Disabilities Act), nor retaliation, see Littleton v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLC, 
568 F.3d 641
, 644 (8th Cir. 2009).

      Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer