United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 10-3249
                                    ___________

Karolyn A. Handke,                   *
                                     *
           Appellant,                *
                                     * Appeal from the United States
     v.                              * District Court for the
                                     * Western District of Missouri.
McBride, Lock & Associates; Charles *
H. McBride; Robert J. Lock,          *
                                     * [UNPUBLISHED]
           Appellees.                *
                                ___________

                              Submitted: February 4, 2011
                                 Filed: June 17, 2011
                                  ___________

Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Karolyn Handke appeals the district court’s1 dismissal for failure to exhaust her
discrimination complaint against her former employer. After careful de novo review,
see Coons v. Mineta, 

, 1039 (8th Cir. 2005), we affirm. We agree with
the district court that Handke’s lawsuit was untimely filed more than 90 days after she
received a right-to-sue letter on her June 2009 charge, which alleged her discharge
was motivated by discrimination. Handke could not cure her untimeliness by filing


      1
        The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
a second charge based on the same adverse employment action. See Spears v. Mo.
Dep’t of Corr. & Human Res., 

, 853 & n.2 (8th Cir. 2000); Williams v.
Little Rock Mun. Water Works, 

, 222 (8th Cir. 1994).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




                                       -2-