Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Johnson v. Michael J. Astrue, 10-3741 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 10-3741 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 28, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-3741 _ Joseph Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 23, 2011 Filed: March 28, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) action for
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 10-3741
                                   ___________

Joseph Johnson,                       *
                                      *
            Appellant,                *
                                      * Appeal from the United States
      v.                              * District Court for the
                                      * Eastern District of Missouri.
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner,      *
Social Security Administration,       * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                      *
            Appellee.                 *
                                 ___________

                             Submitted: March 23, 2011
                                 Filed: March 28, 2011
                                 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                        ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having carefully reviewed the record
and considered Johnson’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court’s
reasons for concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking. See In Home


      1
       The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Frederick R. Buckles, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of
Missouri.
Health, Inc. v. Shalala, 
272 F.3d 554
, 559 (8th Cir. 2001) (de novo review). We
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the
pending motion for sanctions.
                       ______________________________




                                      -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer