Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 12-4050 _ Jose Barron lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: August 28, 2013 Filed: September 3, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mexican citizen Jose Barron petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigrati
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 12-4050 _ Jose Barron lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: August 28, 2013 Filed: September 3, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mexican citizen Jose Barron petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigratio..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-4050
___________________________
Jose Barron
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: August 28, 2013
Filed: September 3, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Mexican citizen Jose Barron petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an immigration judge’s decision denying
him asylum and withholding of removal. After careful review, we find no basis for
granting the petition, as the BIA’s denial of relief was supported by substantial
evidence on the record as a whole. See Cubillos v. Holder,
565 F.3d 1054, 1056-58
(8th Cir. 2009) (substantial-evidence standard for asylum claim; denial of asylum
dictates same outcome on withholding-of-removal claim based on same underlying
factual allegations). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
-2-