Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Santiago Cordova-Ramirez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 13-1404 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 13-1404 Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-1404 _ Santiago Cordova-Ramirez lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: November 6, 2013 Filed: November 8, 2013 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Santiago Cordova-Ramirez, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for revi
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 13-1404
                         ___________________________

                            Santiago Cordova-Ramirez

                             lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                           v.

             Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

                            lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                    ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                           Submitted: November 6, 2013
                             Filed: November 8, 2013
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Santiago Cordova-Ramirez, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed, without opinion,
an immigration judge’s decision denying him asylum and withholding of removal.
After careful review, we find no basis for granting the petition, as the BIA’s denial
of relief was supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See
Cubillos v. Holder, 
565 F.3d 1054
, 1056-58 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantial-evidence
standard for BIA decision; denial of asylum dictates same outcome on
withholding-of-removal claim based on same underlying factual allegations).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                      -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer